AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
![]() ![]() However, if the objective is to increase calories or dietary diversity, vouchers are the most cost-effective means of doing so, followed by cash although food vouchers is the modality least preferred by beneficiaries.ĭespite substantial research into the impact of food assistance and the impact of conditional cash transfers (CCTs), in many context there is almost no evidence from a rigorous evaluation directly comparing the impact and cost-effectiveness of cash transfers and food transfers in the same setting. Key findings were that cash allows for savings that helps households smooth their food and non-food consumption. An evaluation by WFP and IFPR was undertaken to compare the impact of the three interventions. Following an assessment in 2010, WFP established food, food voucher and cash transfer programmes through a number of implementing NGOs in two adjacent provinces in the north of the country. ![]() Evaluation headlines: Levels of food insecurity and associated anaemia are high amongst Columbian refugees and poor Ecuadorians in the northern provinces of Ecuador. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |